Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(17): 8019-8025, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37750631

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate and compare gingival retraction in terms of lateral and vertical displacement with a magic foam cord, conventional retraction cord, and laser. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This in-vivo experimental study was performed on 60 patients. Three different gingival retraction systems were used to evaluate the amount of vertical and lateral displacement. The study sample units were divided into three groups of 20 units each. Tooth preparation was done for a metal-ceramic restoration with a subgingival finish line. Gingival displacement was accomplished with a magic foam cord, conventional retraction, and laser. Vertical and Lateral displacement was measured by the distance from the finish line to the free gingival margin in pre and post-displacement casts with the help of a traveling microscope. Stereomicroscopic images of the impression of ×10 resolution were scanned into an image analyzer to measure the lateral displacement. The data analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test were used to determine the significant difference at the p<0.05 level. RESULTS: Independent group analysis comparing the vertical and lateral displacement within each group showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) with mean maximum vertical and lateral displacement achieved by lasers (0.73 and 0.61) followed by magic foam (0.37 and 0.21) and least by retraction cord (0.21 and 0.13), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laser provided the maximum lateral and vertical displacement of the gingival margins, followed by magic foam cord, and the least with conventional retraction, which was statistically significant.


Subject(s)
Gingival Retraction Techniques , Humans , Gingiva
2.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 26(8): 1157-1164, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635611

ABSTRACT

Background: Human teeth and nails have demonstrated similar factors genetically, embryologically, and morphologically. The fingernail form may be used as a post-extraction guide for selecting the tooth form. Aim: To evaluate the correlation between the maxillary left central incisor tooth form with the left index, middle, and ring fingernails in the Saudi Arabian population. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with purposive sampling was done among 200 Saudi participants. The maxillary left central incisor and the left index, middle, and ring fingernail were scanned using an intraoral scanner. The 3D digital images were converted to 3D models. The tooth form (tooth length, tooth width, and tooth shape) and nail form (nail length, nail width, and nail shape) were measured using the CAD software. Pearson's correlation coefficient and T-test were used for statistical analysis (P < 0.05). Result: A significant correlation exists between tooth length and nail length, with a maximum correlation toward index nail length (P = 0.015). A significant correlation exists between tooth width and nail width, with a maximum correlation toward ring nail width (P = 0.002). A significant correlation exists between tooth length and nail length in females with a maximum correlation toward index nail length in females (P = 0.001). The mean percentage of similarity between tooth and nail shape (index, middle, and ring) in males and females shows a highly significant difference between them (P = 0.001). The results indicate that the tooth and nail shape are similar (70 to 90%) based on the criteria set by the software. Conclusion: A definite correlation exists between maxillary central incisor tooth form and fingernail form. The fingernail form may be used as a post-extraction guide for selecting the maxillary central incisor tooth form in the Saudi Arabian population.


Subject(s)
Incisor , Nails , Female , Male , Humans , Saudi Arabia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Software
3.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(23): 9030-9039, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36524522

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of information sources on the knowledge regarding COVID-19 among undergraduate dental students in India, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Turkey. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire in a Google form link was circulated among the target population via various online platforms. It consisted of 14 close-ended questions assessing these students' knowledge and source of COVID-19-related information. SPSS software version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to compute descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, independent t-test, and ANOVA tests for comparing various variables, and a p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study yielded 809 responses from dental undergraduate students from India, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Turkey. Dental students from Turkey reported a higher mean knowledge score of 7.91±1.34 and 7.88±0.58 for Malaysian dental students. In contrast, the lower scores were achieved by Saudi Arabia (7.36±1.22) and India (7.37±1.21) dental students, and the findings were statistically significant (p<0.05). The study population used various sources to attain information regarding COVID-19. Most respondents (63.1%) utilized information regarding COVID-19 from multiple sources rather than single sources (36.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable and validated information sources resulted in higher knowledge scores. Turkey and Malaysia dental students reported a higher mean knowledge score and the lowest for Saudi Arabia and India dental students. There is increased popularity of social media platforms as information sources.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Students, Dental , Information Sources , Cross-Sectional Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology
4.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(12): 4274-4278, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35776027

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) does not use ionizing radiation and provides a comparatively better resolution. It is an important tool for the diagnosis of problems related to the head and neck area. It has various applications in dentistry, including MRI-based planning for implant placement. Previously, studies have been performed to assess its medical use, but very few studies have been conducted on its applications in dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pre-validated online questionnaire was distributed through various messenger groups and social media. The questionnaire comprised two sections to collect demographics and assess the knowledge and awareness among dentists about the interactions between dental prostheses and materials with MRI. RESULTS: In the present study, 63.20% of respondents indicated that MRI provided a good view of the implant sites, TMJ and salivary gland tumours, but the majority believed that metallic and titanium implants do not interact or cause artefacts on MRI imaging. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that dental undergraduates and graduates had limited knowledge of the interactions of dental materials and prostheses with MRI. Dentists should be aware of interactions of MRI with the various dental materials and prostheses and possible image distortion to ensure the safety of the patient.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Artifacts , Dental Materials , Dentists , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
5.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 24(10): 1457-1462, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34657010

ABSTRACT

AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the effect on condylar guidance values with casts mounted by facebow transfer (Guichet's point as the third point of reference), Bonwill's, and radiographic method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dentulous subject's casts were mounted to a semi-adjustable articulator (Artex Type AR) after facebow transfer with Guichet's point as the third point of reference and also by Bonwill's method. Protrusive records made earlier were utilized to program the right and left side condylar guidance value. Two digital lateral cephalograms were made, one in centric relation, and one in protrusion and the condyles were traced and overlapped. The condylar guidance readings obtained by Bonwill's method, facebow transfer, and lateral cephalometric tracings were compared in this study using the SPSS (Version 17.0 Illinois, Chicago, USA) software. RESULTS: The condylar guidance values obtained from Bonwill's and the facebow transfer method (p < 0.001) was lesser than the radiographic method. The values obtained by casts mounted to the Bonwill's method differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the other two methods. CONCLUSION: The values obtained by facebow transfer were closer to the radiographic values whereas the values obtained by Bonwill's method mounting differed markedly.


Subject(s)
Dental Articulators , Mandibular Condyle , Cephalometry , Extraoral Traction Appliances , Humans , Jaw Relation Record , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...